I received both text and email when I did this. Perhaps you have a typo in the email address you supplied the merchant?@wanderer wrote:
Yes, I did. I got a confirmation text that contained all of the detail and was time stamped as well and I told them that I was submitting that in lieu of the nonexistent email.
I wonder if some accounts are set to receive texts instead of you are already set up as a customer?
@wanderer wrote:
Actually, every bit of that detail was shown in the text. Interestingly, there was another issue that I had with the shop regarding an hair in the food.
There were no instructions on what to do if there was a problem with the order—should I bring it to their attention or should I just note it in the report? I emailed for advice about both of these problems before submitting my report so you would think that when my report came through, it would’ve been flagged for that problem. I guess whoever gets the reports to edit are not privy to the information that gets sent when there are questions so…
Since the MSC is named in the title, naming the Client is a violation of Forum rules. Feel free to edit out the violation and re-post.
Since the MSC is named in the title, naming the Client is a violation of Forum rules. Feel free to edit out the violation and re-post.
Since the MSC is named in the title, naming the Client is a violation of Forum rules. Feel free to edit out the violation and re-post.
Since the MSC is named in the title, naming the Client is a violation of Forum rules. Feel free to edit out the violation and re-post.
I've marked them down for food quality issues and have gotten a 10. You need to take care with how you say it, factual description rather than opinion. "The green beans and chicken entree had only two very small pieces of chicken in it" is acceptable while "They didn't put enough chicken in the green beans and chicken entree" is not.@KV wrote:
Unfortunately, this company doesn't want to hear the truth. Whenever the report has a negative tone due to their associate's performance or the food not being up to standard, your score will be reduced accordingly. Reporting hair in the food was probably the most offensive issue they couldn’t accept.
@edithms wrote:
I did the same thing with the same client, who has CHANGED how they respond to their online customers. What you received is what they send you now...in other words, you do NOT get the full page order confirmation, just the short email. I am hoping IPSOS got the memo.....
@etcardent wrote:
I had one where the cashier applied a discount without me asking and I had to ask them to remove the discount because discounts aren’t allowed and I have had a shop rejected before on this client for something similar. Nothing says “mystery shopper” like asking them to take off the 10% discount they are giving to everyone. The one I had rejected, the editor said that I was required to check my receipt before leaving and ask them to remove anything not allowed-I would rather loose the shop then go back to the register and ask them to remove a discount if I didn’t catch it while checking out.
I also did two online shops two weeks ago and got the email confirmation from both. Perhaps it is where you are ordering from? I always order from the webpage.
@Isaiah4031a wrote:
@etcardent wrote:
I had one where the cashier applied a discount without me asking and I had to ask them to remove the discount because discounts aren’t allowed and I have had a shop rejected before on this client for something similar. Nothing says “mystery shopper” like asking them to take off the 10% discount they are giving to everyone. The one I had rejected, the editor said that I was required to check my receipt before leaving and ask them to remove anything not allowed-I would rather loose the shop then go back to the register and ask them to remove a discount if I didn’t catch it while checking out.
I also did two online shops two weeks ago and got the email confirmation from both. Perhaps it is where you are ordering from? I always order from the webpage.
What did they say when you told them you did not want the discount?
@shopperbob wrote:
Dee, thank you for an excellent response for the situation. That one has only popped up once in my shopping yrs. and I was not prepared with a logical reply. I did inform the MSC of the situation and they agreed it was beyond my control; I was paid.
Since the MSC is named in the title, naming the Client, or Client's obvious initials, is a violation of Forum rules. Feel free to edit out the violation and re-post.
Since the MSC is named in the title, naming the Client, or Client's obvious initials, is a violation of Forum rules. Feel free to edit out the violation and re-post.
Since the MSC is named in the title, naming the Client is a violation of Forum rules. Feel free to edit out the violation and re-post.