Cyn, please, go back and read the post again as you missed its point and did not interpret is correctly.
cynb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Strevel Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > There are companies that thrive and grow (ICCDS
> is
> > NOT one of them) and make money on others
> > mistakes. They will change the report that they
> > say you screwed up and send it in for their
> > payment. You worked, they could have helped
> you
> > to do a better job, and they still get paid.
> > These problems exist and the companies that
> grow
> > based up on ido as well.
> >
> > I have seen sites that are so slow and "clunky"
> > that they do not work at times. If you run up on
> a
> > site that is difficult to operate from your
> end,
> > just avoid that company as it is a view of
> things
> > to come .
> >
> > Don '
> Please explain how ICCDS changes their reports
> before they send them to a client. I do not get
> it. If you are going to make these allegations
> please support them.I have worked for them for 6
> years and have never had a problem and alwys get
> paid on time.
> Please be aware that you are accusing this company
> and their employees of fraud.
> If we are just going around and @#$%& about
> unfounded practices the whole point of this forum
> is negated. Please support these claims. I will
> wait to hear. When you nane a business if falls in
> the category of libel.
> >
> > Cyn
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Flash Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I'm not real thrilled with ICCDS's website.
> It
> > > feels 'clunky' and is sometimes downright
> > ornery.
> > > But it has not caused me major pains.
> Checking
> > to
> > > make sure they credited my invoice/receipt is
> > > usually a multi-visit deal because it is not
> > very
> > > prompt. But when push comes to shove I don't
> > need
> > > to hound them for payment. I have had few
> > > interactions with folks who work there, which
> > is
> > > also a plus in my book because usually
> > > interactions are because there are either
> > problems
> > > on my side or theirs.