Flash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Perhaps they have had a dense one who did?
>
> Edited to add: It is really hard to tell,
> sometimes, just how much of shop instructions and
> requirements are knee jerk reactions to shopper
> errors or poor instructions that didn't really get
> the expected response when used on site. I did
> some phone shops that said, "Get a name." So when
> Suzy answered the phone and gave me her name, I
> gave her credit and reported I spoke with Suzy.
> The client expected Suzy to give both her first
> and last name. News to me. My shops weren't
> disallowed but the instructions were changed to
> "Get a first and last name." That immediately
> makes the shop more complicated because now if
> Suzy only gives me her first name, I need to
> elicit her last name without throwing suspicion
> that I am a shopper. Since only about half of
> their employees gave first and last name, I am
> rethinking whether the pay (which was marginal to
> start with) is worth the risk of being identified
> as the shopper and not paid for my work at all.
Someone that dense is a "Dunce", right?
My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me.
Benjamin Disraeli