Fair enough, I didn't realize they were different people as only the first name was mentioned.@AustinMom wrote:
@Misanthrope wrote:
I'm getting the feeling this particular scheduler, Tracy, is having trouble sending out emails notifying shoppers they've been scheduled for things. In this thread (http://www.mysteryshopforum.com/read/2/509614) a shopper was given a citation for not doing a shop that was assigned to them at 7 PM and due at midnight that day, and Tracy claims that she assigned it the previous day. The shopper swears up and down they never got the initial assignment, only the subsequent email.
Rather than being an issue on the shoppers' ends, it may be an issue with Tracy and whatever software or service provider she may use. It's disgusting that shoppers are getting punished for a scheduler's error.
Misanthrope, you may want to edit your post. The thread that you cite is actually a DIFFERENT Tracy. The scheduler being discussed in this thread is actually Tracy A. Keller, who schedules for Service Scouts.
The scheduler being discussed in the thread you referenced is Tracy Ziemendorf , an independent scheduler for Reality Based.
Definitely both similar shopper complaints, but complaints about two different schedulers who schedule for two different companies.
That was my issue. I was told that the seats are different every time because they are shopping different people. That's fine and it makes sense. However, if they truly don't know until just before, then they need to renegotiate with their clients. A reimbursement-only shop makes sense when you're getting $150 tickets; not so much when they're $20 tickets. At that point, I'd rather buy my own cheap seats and enjoy the game. I'm not willing to take the chance of getting that 3rd deck seat AND having to shell out unreimbursed food costs.@angelagoble wrote:
Also, worth noting that sometimes the tickets are really awful seats, lol.
@Tostresh wrote:
The whole thing is so ridiculous
Where does the number $150 come from? Is it a number the MSC "pulled" out of the air@2stepps wrote:
Sounds like it really needs to go to Judge Joe Brown or Judge Judy!
Taking the kid to a professional baseball game would be a perfect birthday gift and time spent with nana.@jmitw wrote:
I'm sorry, but missing an important event for a grandson (birthday party) would not be a viable option for me...unless I was actually too sick to go. Things like that mean a lot to kids.
@angelagoble wrote:
I worked for Service Scouts doing lots of evaluations for over 5 years but as soon as Tracy took over for Cheryl I began having a lot of trouble with her. The breaking point was a game I agreed to do on 12/23 (the day before xmas eve). I got my shop in on time and was told to wait for it to be reviewed. I checked my mail regularly the following day and did not see any emails from Tracy. I assumed my shop did not need any editing after 24 hours had passed and I spent Christmas morning with my family. Around 1pm on Christmas day I logged into my email account and saw that I had received an email from Tracy at 9 am Christmas morning, more than 24 hours after I had submitted the shop for approval. I immediately logged into my SS shop and began doing the few requested edits. When I was done I hit "submit edits" and it would not load. After trying unsuccessfully to submit them, I emailed Tracy to let her know I was having a problem. She did not respond right away and around 3pm I went back to enjoying my holiday. Later that evening she sent me an email advising me that her email at 9am on Christmas day stated I had "two hours" to complete the edits and that I had not complied to that deadline which is why I could not perform the edits. I apologized for my tardiness in seeing the email and forgot about it.
A few weeks later I was checking on the status of my reimbursements when i saw that she had denied any reimbursements for that shop. When I contacted her, she told me I had failed to meet the contract expectations regarding completing the shop edits. She then included a portion of the contract which stated that I had x amount of hours to complete the edits after they were requested. Upon further review of the contract, I found that she had failed to comply with the time allotment for requesting my edits so she agreed to, "as a one-time courtesy", reimburse half of my out-of-pocket costs. I have never done another shop for them. I think she is having a hard time filling slots because so many shoppers have had horrible experiences with her.
@Tostresh wrote:
Could you forward those emails with the headers? I did not receive the emails.
@tracy@servicescouts.com wrote:
Actually- this post is incorrect. I was not your scheduler for this event. Please double check your information before you slander my name. You have done exactly one assignment for me, for which you were not given a poor rating. That shop was not at Christmas time.
@bgriffin wrote:
@tracy@servicescouts.com wrote:
Actually- this post is incorrect. I was not your scheduler for this event. Please double check your information before you slander my name. You have done exactly one assignment for me, for which you were not given a poor rating. That shop was not at Christmas time.
Just to clarify, are you merely denying you are the scheduler for this event or are you denying that none of the other things happened?
I am not at all trying to stir the pot, I'm simply curious because to me a company sending an email on Christmas morning and then cancelling the shop because I was spending time with my family on the only day of the year they are all together is fairly pertinent information when deciding to do work for that company.
I'll be honest, I have several times wanted to do shops for Service Scouts. I log in and look at job boards and think wow that would be fun. At the same time there seem to be a lot of complaints. And every time there is a complaint there is a forceful it was your fault not ours response. Which makes me wonder if the company is pretty heavy handed with shoppers. Perhaps I would feel a bit better if once there was an ooooops we messed up reply. And if the company is so heavy handed it makes me wonder if perhaps their pool of shoppers is on the lower end of the spectrum. And if that's the case why? Is it because the jobs are too much work for the pay?
I just have questions. And multiple threads that shed a negative light on the company scare me.