@FluffyCat wrote:
I have completed many shops for GFK. What you say is untrue. They are an excellent company and they are honest. Payment has always been quick and on time.
@dakotagypsy wrote:
I just did my first shop with GFK last month and was very happy with them. I got 10 out 10 on my first submission. They paid in about 2 weeks. What more could you ask? OK, more money would be nice but we can't have everything. I look forward to doing more work for them.
@kathygry wrote:
I think that all MSC's have had complaints against them at one time or another. I realize that GFK has had more than usual, lately. When a poster comes on and bashes a company with a lot of emotion (perceived, at least) instead of facts of what happened, I tend to discount the entire post. We have no idea of what actually transpired. The "they are a bad company and I know they are using my report" post gets old. I have been on the receiving end of a rejected report Fortunately, not too many times! Out of the three rejected reports I have had, all three were my fault. I was upset, at first. But once I calmed down and really looked at what I submitted, I knew I had made the mistakes. I think if people let their emotions cool before posting, we wouldn't see so many of these types of posts. Having said all that, I don't like GFK's tests and their jobs tend to start out on the low end of the pay scale. I don't do too much for them, except when they bonus shops. I also am SO tired of cell phone shops. It takes quite a bit to get me to do one of those! OP - I'm sorry you had that experience. I hope you find out what really happened and use it as a learning experience.
ETA - the rejected reports were for different MSC's. Not from GFK.
@Carey4GfKMysteryShops wrote:
Hi All,
My name is Carey Medina, and I am the scheduling manager for GfK. Happy to have a conversation about a rejected shop if needed - Just email me at carey.medina@gfk.com.................................................. Looking forward to hearing from any of you who wish to chat!
@Carey4GfKMysteryShops wrote:
Hi All,
My name is Carey Medina, and I am the scheduling manager for GfK. Happy to have a conversation about a rejected shop if needed - Just email me at carey.medina@gfk.com. Also - to be clear - We do, in fact, want to pay you. If your report gets rejected, we cannot use it because our client won't pay for it. The editor doesn't get paid, the scheduler doesn't get paid, and GFK doesn't get paid. So, we have to send someone else out in the field to try again.
Contrary to popular belief, that is the simple truth. So, if you feel your report was rejected without warrant, let's talk about it.![]()
Looking forward to hearing from any of you who wish to chat!
@sarjmacc wrote:
I have been shopping with GfK and I find that they are one of the quickest (and fairest) reviewers.
@AustinMom wrote:
@kathygry wrote:
I think that all MSC's have had complaints against them at one time or another. I realize that GFK has had more than usual, lately. When a poster comes on and bashes a company with a lot of emotion (perceived, at least) instead of facts of what happened, I tend to discount the entire post. We have no idea of what actually transpired. The "they are a bad company and I know they are using my report" post gets old. I have been on the receiving end of a rejected report Fortunately, not too many times! Out of the three rejected reports I have had, all three were my fault. I was upset, at first. But once I calmed down and really looked at what I submitted, I knew I had made the mistakes. I think if people let their emotions cool before posting, we wouldn't see so many of these types of posts. Having said all that, I don't like GFK's tests and their jobs tend to start out on the low end of the pay scale. I don't do too much for them, except when they bonus shops. I also am SO tired of cell phone shops. It takes quite a bit to get me to do one of those! OP - I'm sorry you had that experience. I hope you find out what really happened and use it as a learning experience.
ETA - the rejected reports were for different MSC's. Not from GFK.
Very well said. I do not work for GFK because I'm not tempted by their fees. But anytime a new forum member registers simply to bash a company with a lot of emotion and no facts, I can't help but think that poster is full of bull. And when the poster makes seven posts, every one of them emotional warnings with no facts against the same company, they simply appear vindictive to me as well as full of bull.
Note to all posters, whether new posters or "old" posters: if you want to warn me about a bad situation with a MSC, post the facts. Tell me what happened. Save the drama for your mama. Anger and emotion are not an effective warning. An unsubstantiated, emotional attack on a company merely makes a poster look petty and foolish. Most times when posters write emotional tirades with no facts, it seems to suggest that they were wrong and that's the reason they don't want to tell what happened.