I have always been a big believer that two wrongs do not make a right. That any company fails to perform their obligations does not free me unconditionally from mine. Different strokes, different folks I guess. I know of no shoppers that have been prosecuted for violating an ICA but I suspect many find themselves terminated or at least not able to be assigned jobs because of violations.
Indeed legal judgements are enforceable in most places and most likely NY State as well. But there are lots of loopholes to avoid enforcement. More than ten years ago a group of juveniles broke into my house while I was away for the weekend. They partied hearty, spilling beer they brought in with them everywhere, puking everywhere, throwing containers from my fridge in a running battle through the house so salad dressings, stews, ketchup etc were dribbling down the walls and in the carpet. They threw a telephone into a ceiling fan and used my violin as a bat to try to hit the receiver as it spun around the room. More than $40,000 in damage in an evening's "fun". The courts found them and their parents (they were all minors) liable for restitution. The courts scheduled "easy monthly payments" that should have had me paid up in 7 years. After nearly twice that time, one 'kid' has paid less than half his legal obligation. Any time he pays $3 per month ($2 stays with the court, $1 gets sent along to me and reduces his outstanding debt) he is not considered 'in violation'. We will be playing this game for decades to come.