frodosdojo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> zlinedavid Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > frodosdojo Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > For two, it
> > > reminds us that they are skirting the law in
> > order
> > > to not pay us health benefits and social
> > security
> > > tax to the IRS and other such things.
> >
> > How is paying an independent contractor
> skirting
> > any type of law? Consultants, specialists and
> > temps have been around for years and years.
> >
> > And employers are not required to offer health
> > benefits, even if you are an employee. A good
> > amount of part-time employees have no employee
> > sponsored healthcare.
>
> Because the laws have changed. There was no reason
> to require EINs if the laws hadn't changed.
The law does not require an independent contractor to have an EIN. It's still perfectly legal and acceptable for a sole independent contractor to file under his or her SSN. Your response is exactly what MSI wants you to think. "Oh gosh, well, they wouldn't make us do it if the laws hadn't changed."
If it is now a federal requirement, why hasn't every MSC enacted this?