10. Alternate format for banned books. Picture it: Dr. Seuss' little gang are all strung out on small, multi-filtered story picture boards instead of bound up in pages and libraries. "A banned book is a banned book, no matter how small." (Shop-et-al, 2021, and with love for the entirety of kiddie lit.) I checked. It is not illegal to read banned books. It is merely likely to be difficult to find those books. For a good and still-legal read:
[
academicarchive.snhu.edu]
Megan Palmer suggested that banned books ban the future.
Others strongly suggest that banning student access to various materials presumes that students are incapable of forming ideas. This presumes that they are incapable of comprehending and applying previously encountered concepts. The better idea is to let them read widely and give them their time to think about what they have read. They can figure things out and carry on. They are the future, after all. I want the kids of today who will manage the future tomorrow to be able to contend with the pleasant, the unpleasant, the nuanced, the blunt, the fantastical, the whimsical, the harsh, the fleeting, the lingering, the previous, the present, the soft, the hard, and everything in between and beyond! The gamut of kiddie lit will provide this for them.
Being older than students does not give license to inflict our limiting views upon them. One underlying question is: why do some in [academia, politics, industry, ?] have a need, or even an overwhelming compulsion, to wedge students into the few and slim cracks in their own views? Another: Are these untreated souls contributing more to the world's problems by forcing issues than by seeking to resolve their own difficulties? Are they merely projecting? A third: Have the tables turned completely instead of shifting one position? Has this created an opposite set of "isms"? This last would be epic fail for education. That would be tragic.
Bach is not noise, Madam. (Robert, in Two's Company)