@prince wrote:
Former landlady. Glad I'm not one now. If my renters lost work and couldn't pay. Then it's my problem?
I wouldn't want to evict anyone, but when I was a landlady, I had a mortgage, so where would I be? Yikes.
Now I own a holiday rental. That made $0 since the pandemic. Didn't keep up with condo fees. But subsidized the condo fees a bit.
@walesmaven wrote:
My sister and bil own a premium beach condo on thewest Florida coast that commanded very high monthly rents (minimum rental is 30 days) until the pandemic. Those high winter rents were all to Canadians who cannot cross the border no. So, much lower winter rents. BUT, with so many people modifying/renovating their own homes for more comfortable tle-commuting, they have been able to get some summer rentals (at much lower prices) and some US-based winter renters are paying about 20% less per winter month. Their established Canadian clients have all reserved winter months for next season, at full rents, with right to cancel if the border remains closed.
All-in-all mortgage, taxes and condo fees remain covered by total rents, but no profit.
@HonnyBrown wrote:
That's what I am curious about: rentals that pay mortgages.
There is financial help for renters and they may or may not forward that help to the landlords. If the landlords fall behind, the property goes into foreclosure and the renter is kicked out.
Who wins other than the banks?
Btw, I think if it were up to the "super progressives," they'd bailout everything and everyone (a la Europe) - including landlords.@KateH wrote:
That's what upsets me with all these liberal, woke politicians.
I feel for landlords. My parents rented out their old house for years, but finally sold it after a very bad experience with some military personnel (I think they were sailors of some sort). Damaged the house and fled without paying their final month's rent. This was pre-COVID, though.@ wrote:
The extension of the CDC order is particularly tough on smaller mom-and-pop property owners, many of whom have been running in the red for months, said Pinnegar.
These small independent operators own about 22.1 million rental units, which Pinnegar said is more than half of the nation's supply.
Already some property owners are struggling to meet their financial obligations and maintain their buildings, he said. "Without rent, owners can't afford maintenance or capital improvements necessary to preserve the units," he said, which could have consequences that ripple out into the community and housing industry.
Owners also may not be able to pay the mortgage — which, according to Pinnegar's association accounts for 38 cents of every rent dollar. That puts millions of rental units at risk of foreclosure.
@KateH wrote:
That's what upsets me with all these liberal, woke politicians. I feel terrible for the tenant but what about the landlord, the small business owner? Thankfully I was fine as I cut the rent 10% early between tenants while others kept them high, but think of the single parents, elderly, others who depend on the rent they get to subsidize their income, or might be their only income. The city does not forgive real estate taxes, mortgage, hoa fees, need to get paid and the landlord does not get any income.
@HonnyBrown wrote:
That's what I am curious about: rentals that pay mortgages.
There is financial help for renters and they may or may not forward that help to the landlords. If the landlords fall behind, the property goes into foreclosure and the renter is kicked out.
Who wins other than the banks?
"I told myself to quit you; but I don't listen to drunks." -Chris Stapleton
@shoptastic wrote:
Should call/write/bother your political representatives to offer some sort of landlord bailouts. It's not fair for them.
@KateH wrote:
They stopped foreclosures and evictions because it does not cost anything to them....
@sueac101 wrote:
I love my landlords, I have lived here 27 years and they never have raised my rent. When my husband passed away suddenly in 2003 they offered to waive the rent for 2 months. They are retired in their mid 80's and the rent supplements their income.
@wrosie wrote:
@sueac101 wrote:
A tenant that takes care of the property and never bothers the landlord is every landlord's dream.
Bach is not noise, Madam. (Robert, in Two's Company)
Once I heard you sometimes have to clean toilets in managing your properties (granted, you can pay someone to do that), I said: "Nope!"@foodluvr wrote:
I have had my fair share of headaches over the years with rental property and have decided it is really not worth it.
@1forum1 wrote:
I once had houses in California, New Mexico, and Arizona. All, but one house in California were rentals. I hate to think of not getting the rent for those other houses. I understand the eviction moratorium, and I agree one is needed. However, I dunno how long I would have lasted if the income for the rentals stopped. Ordinarily, selling the house is a good option, but with a renter who is not paying, and a moratorium on evictions, it would be almost impossible to find a buyer. Anyway, I wonder if there was no moratorium if I would find myself in the same situation of no rent coming in. Are qualified renters lined up to fill the vacancy? Are there enough qualified renters to fill the vacancies mass evictions would create? Maybe we will find out around March, April, May or whenever the moratorium ends.
@shoptastic wrote:
Once I heard you sometimes have to clean toilets in managing your properties (granted, you can pay someone to do that), I said: "Nope!"@foodluvr wrote:
I have had my fair share of headaches over the years with rental property and have decided it is really not worth it.
I don't think I'll ever manage rentals. I don't like dealing with those situations and people in them. They scare me. But, I understand it can be great for those who are handy, understand real estate, and are good with working with people in those situations.
I'm more of a nerd. I'd rather invest in stocks, which takes only a click of the mouse. I'd much rather read/research macroeconomics and company filings than to clean bathrooms, mow lawns, repair plumbing, etc.
Ah, that's another thing. When speaking with family members who've used agents to manage their rentals, they said it could be a pain getting a hold of them (literally weeks without a phone response...and you're paying them!).@foodluvr wrote:
We hired management companies to handle the day today but still I wouldn't do it again.
@1forum1 wrote:
I always had single family homes and used a property management company. I didn't have the time, and I did not want to personally interact with the renters and deal with problems. Also, with property in different states, I needed a property management company.
@HonnyBrown ... looks like landlords will get screwed. More should be done to help. Seems like that $1400 dollar stimulus non paying renters receive should be redirected directly to their landlords or something for example. There are some landowners with deep pockets, and can withstand the setback, and know that in time things will turn around. To them, it's a bump in the road, and maybe an opportunity to obtain more property at greatly reduced prices. Then, there are people like I was. I could deal with some temporary income reduction, but I would be a sweating nervous wreck. Long term income reduction could be devastating if I could not sell.
This was the most recent stimulus check usage polling I could find:@1forum1 wrote:
Seems like that $1400 dollar stimulus non paying renters receive should be redirected directly to their landlords or something for example.