@SoCalMama wrote:
LOL They are looting and burning CA on the first weekend of re-opening. Nothing to buy now. It's all been stolen.
@Shop-et-al wrote:
Major summer events have been cancelled, and this will likely limit the number of people coming to and through my state. Huzzah! I do feel for people and businesses who will lose some or all of their anticipated revenue for that time frame. I used to work the tourist seasons, and I know how important that is for workers at many levels and in many places. But I am pleased that the reduced numbers this year makes our state generally similar to individual locations that limit the number of people on premises at any given time. This will make it easier to practice social distancing on a larger scale than at, say, Wally World. People can come back next year or the year after that. I hope that the dratted disease will not be an issue for future tourist seasons around the world!
We went for several drives into the countryside this week... Aaaaaahhhhhhh...... lovely! Few people were hanging out, and we had an entire bit of wilderness to ourselves for awhile. This should be the new normal, imho. There were birds, critters, and... two mere humans. They outnumbered us, and they sang better.
@shoptastic wrote:
Under normal circumstances, protests are an American right. In a medical pandemic like this, I believe they should be illegal.
It is illegal, that's why the officer has been arrested and charged. That's not to say I don't understand the frustration Americans have with police brutality.@Tarantado wrote:
If our officers and their continuous Abuse of Power isn’t illegal during a medical pandemic, neither should our Right to Protest.@shoptastic wrote:
Under normal circumstances, protests are an American right. In a medical pandemic like this, I believe they should be illegal.
Probably most protesters were peaceful and mask wearing - even if they were not social distancing.@Shop-et-al wrote:
I do not dispute that people have rights. Rights extend to the sweet spot where responsibilities begin. I dislike the initiating event, and I equally dislike the subsequent vicious destruction. I like rights, and I equally like self control. How does incited, wanton, and willful destruction honor the life and death of George Floyd? It only shows pots and kettles. This is not helpful or thoughtful. Each and every protestor should have the same charges against them in the same style that they want the rest of us to support regarding all four officers. If they want all four officers charged, then they all should be charged with being perpetrators or accessories of looting, burning, and other devastation and destruction. This would be fair. When will people learn?!
@shoptastic wrote:
You have the right to protest. You should not have that right when it endangers others' lives. This includes blocking freeways (some people are trying to get to a doctor!), engaging in violence, or fostering the spread of a dangerous virus.
Frankly, shopetal, I thought he was expressing what it would feel like if you had a knee pressed on your neck for almost 10 minutes. I think it was eight minutes or so total.@Shop-et-al wrote:
What squicks me most is not knowing whether George Floyd was expressing a medical concern.
I just think of all times to do this stuff, now was not the right one. Sometimes in life, you have to recognize an even greater harm.@Shop-et-al wrote:
In a calmer world . . .
@shoptastic wrote:
It is illegal, that's why the officer has been arrested and charged. That's not to say I don't understand the frustration Americans have with police brutality.
I have supported BLM and other protesting - even when I have disagreed with the specific causes behind them at times (some cases I thought the police were not guilty and others I felt they were) - but I do not support it during a medical pandemic in which over 100,000 Americans have died and the protests violate many states' crowd gathering bans aimed at reducing public health risks.
You have the right to protest. You should not have that right when it endangers others' lives. This includes blocking freeways (some people are trying to get to a doctor!), engaging in violence, or fostering the spread of a dangerous virus.
@Shop-et-al wrote:
The right to protest has been misused and abused. I would not like to have any rights abridged. Rather, I would like changes in activism training and activist behavior which reflect understanding of this one principle: sometimes, you can stop fighting and live to fight another day. In this situation, there is no need to push and push and push until innocent people are harmed. There is no reed to commandeer highways, buildings, and steal other people's opportunities. Rather, there is time to think, to grieve, to learn something different, and to put our new understanding into practice. In a calmer world, this would eventually make its way into a reasoned process of changing certain law enforcement behaviors. No one can change those practices and achieve an improvement if they are too frenzied to consider the various pros and cons of proposed change. Inciters don't want us to think. They just want us to carry out their destructive activism. I choose to remember that I have the right to do things in better ways than that.
]
@Tarantado wrote:
@Shop-et-al wrote:
The right to protest has been misused and abused. I would not like to have any rights abridged. Rather, I would like changes in activism training and activist behavior which reflect understanding of this one principle: sometimes, you can stop fighting and live to fight another day. In this situation, there is no need to push and push and push until innocent people are harmed. There is no reed to commandeer highways, buildings, and steal other people's opportunities. Rather, there is time to think, to grieve, to learn something different, and to put our new understanding into practice. In a calmer world, this would eventually make its way into a reasoned process of changing certain law enforcement behaviors. No one can change those practices and achieve an improvement if they are too frenzied to consider the various pros and cons of proposed change. Inciters don't want us to think. They just want us to carry out their destructive activism. I choose to remember that I have the right to do things in better ways than that.
]
Forgive me of my ignorance, but what change or reform has occurred since the Rodney King incident? I am too young to remember that. I’m referring to specifically that because this was when I was a young toddler. If police brutality was just as bad back then, why does it feel like things haven’t changed much in 2020? Our officers have a special privilege and power as officers. When they do something wrong, they have the best representation, likely get favored by the judicial system even if they were in the wrong, etc. simply because they’re a police officer. In other words, the law STILL doesn’t apply to them equally compared to a normal citizen and even worse, a normal citizen with Afrocentric features.
I don't have an opinion on the guilt of the other three, as I did not pay attention to them as much when viewing the horrific video, Tarantado. I'd honestly not want to view it again - at least, not at the moment. Perhaps I will at a future date. I think if the three clearly saw what Chauvin was doing, heard Floyd's cries for help to breathe, and saw Chauvin continuing to not let up/remove his knee, then I'd think they were guilty as well. It's a bit harder for me to assign guilt to them, because I'm not sure of how much they knew and understood, as they were distracted with controlling the crowd much of the time if my memory is correct. I can imagine it being hard to deal with the onlookers, while having the clarity of mind to also keep an eye on their fellow officer, Chauvin, and what was happening to Floyd. I could see them trusting Chauvin to manage the situation just as Chauvin may have trusted the other three to manage the crowd. I don't want to get too carried away into something I haven't examined enough, but those were just my initial thoughts. I'm much less clear on the guilt of the other three.@Tarantado wrote:
And yet the 3 other officers have yet to be charged. Also, do you genuinely believe the officer currently arrested would’ve turned out this way without push from the public?
Yes, most protesters have been peaceful from what I've seen.@SoCalMama wrote:
At least in CA, the protesters are not rioting, and the rioters are not protesting.
They are two completely different groups of people.
I've followed the meat packing plant infections and the spacing at these rallies is worse than the spacing of meat plant workers. Even when the workers had masks on, they all got infected. Many have been scared to go back to work.@sestrahelena wrote:
I think Rona 2.0, previously scheduled for later this year, will arrive earlier than expected. Most protesters are masked but simple masks are only helpful regarding disease. They are not a guaranteed protection. Some are worn incorrectly. Some are inefficient. Some have been reused and turned inside out. The 6' rule has been abandoned at these gatherings, with people all mushed together, yelling, huffing and puffing. There's a whole lot of breathing going on and germs are being passed.
@SoCalMama wrote:
Well, y’all have a lot of time for typing it seems?
At least in CA, the protesters are not rioting, and the rioters are not protesting.
They are two completely different groups of people.
@shoptastic wrote:
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."
-Martin Luther King, Jr.
@SoCalMama wrote:
Well, y’all have a lot of time for typing it seems?
At least in CA, the protesters are not rioting, and the rioters are not protesting.
They are two completely different groups of people.