@LisaSTL wrote:
Actually his alleged political comments have nothing to do with politics. No discussion of policy, etc. Just unbridled, undisguised misogyny while spouting "facts" that are easy enough to verify as lies.
Now, now, one of his "facts" was, in fact, a fact.
From mystery shopping, I did not learn how/why there were other contexts and possible explanations for one of his statements. I knew this from other experiences and training. I also knew enough to expect, or at least not be surprised by, tomatoes, horror, and other strong reactions from people who read the remark from other perspectives. And this leads-- more or less-- back to the topic of this thread.
From mystery shopping, I learned that one set of guidelines given to multiple shoppers can generate different sets of questions, disagreements, and requests for additional information. It is a wonder how some shops get completed, yes?
Bach is not noise, Madam. (Robert, in Two's Company)