That is a broad territory! On those grounds, we can impeach Nancy Pelosi for obstructing the democratic process while Congress was in session (re:ACA. She made the house vote for it in order to find out what was in it. That was not overtly violent, but it negated all our votes and denied due process). This disenfranchised all voters for that term and all house members' votes for that session. It killed the democratic process, lessened my confidence in the government, and possibly harmed other people's willingness to trust in the process of government. Now, she dares to point fingers???!?!?!?
Then, there is the extremely unpopular question that must be asked in any trial: to what extent was anyone already excitable, especially to the extent of rushing the capitol? Any excitable person might have done this in response to stimuli over a period of time more so than to any urging by an outgoing president. Another sticky wicket involves their feelings. Some of them fought for rights. The government, as they saw it, might have been failing them. (Nancy Pelosi abridged everyone's rights with the ACA debacle.) What other recourse did they have to get the government's attention long enough to re-direct it to their grievances? I do not know if this is their situation, but everyone should be considering all angles.
In his own words, the fellow who was in Nancy Pelosi's office declared that he was pushed into the office. He did not break into it. This might be proved or disproved. Who knows?
Everyone is entitled to their point of view, including people who have jobs. It got messy, apparently, for some employees.
According to Politico, the impeachment charges are not easy to prove. Other charges might have had a better chance of leading to an impeachment. People who think like lawyers would have a larger view of all these considerations. But, why bother about that? President Trump is leaving the office, the space, and the activities associated with them.
According to me, impeachment is a waste of time and energy. Our elected representatives would serve us better by building on Tammy Duckworth's strong resolve and using that to prepare their thinking for any number of possible events that could affect them, us, and/our national allies. For example, N. Korea is making noises, probably to test a new president. But it would be a mistake to blow that off and taper off Trump's strong and good efforts in managing that situation. N. Korea is ready to pounce! A significant number of them have tested positive for Covid-19 recently. Would it be well for them to relax, identify more essential or more effective legislative duties, and retain as much strength and focus as possible for the future with a new president?
This is not a simple little matter.
@HonnyBrown wrote:
It seems that those who allowed the shenanigans were giving enough rope for a noose. The powers that be are talking impeachable offenses.
@Shopper797 wrote:
Excited for the promise of peace in the future. I hope those that disrespected and embarrassed our government get the punishment they deserve. As well as the ones that dropped the ball and allowed them through.
Bach is not noise, Madam. (Robert, in Two's Company)