@HonnyBrown: Good question. Britney Spears had experienced a rough patch, as many people do, and she was placed in a conservatorship that outlasted its usefulness to her. Her pleas for change had been ignored and the very nature of conservatorship permitted this. Part of the difficulty there is inherent in the powers granted to conservators. They may interpret and command practically at will and often without being challenged. As a result, Britney, I, and and unknown number of others have not been heard, responded to, and treated properly. As an ordinary person, I would never make the news or generate any buzz. Just by breathing, Britney generates buzz. Her situation will force a global examination and re-examination of conservatorships, guardianships, and other forms of assistance versus control. This is long overdue, and her fame and willingness to speak out is invaluable for the entire world because we all face little (or large) change points where we may exert or experience too little, too much, or the wrong sort of power, control, or influence. This is part of life, and we all need to know when we are too strong, too weak, or just right. We also need to know how to adjust ourselves lest anyone do this for us (or need to suspend us permanently from a conservatorship!). For me, nothing changed except that someone who used to speak for me and command others as if they knew anything at all about me fell ill, stopped communicating, and then died. During this time, I was finally known as the real me-- not as the monster that was portrayed to others as if on my behalf and in my best interest. Nothing changed, except that tptb discovered that I was so much better that I could be set free. What really happened was... well... perhaps the scales finally fell from their eyes. Grateful and free, I am interested in: 1) Britney's situation is handled properly and other conservatorships or guardianships about which I know nothing also are handled properly. 2) The global understanding of conservatorship is considered, re-considered, altered as needed, and generally is made to be helpful and never harmful to anyone. This will involve many lessons, span every future generation, and will need to reach the wisest of hearts and minds because this will apply to many types of situations around the world. 3) No one else is harmed via conservatorship or guardianship. 4) Conservatorship and guardianship are only helpful and never harmful. 5) If opportunity arises, we all might consider other forms of being helpful and not harmful in extra legal ways. This might ease someone's burden or at least not add to it, even if we never have a legally mandated role in their lives.
Bach is not noise, Madam. (Robert, in Two's Company)