You all have reminded me that I still have to get rid of a house, in a manner of speaking. But first, I want to respond to two bits of the news. Should we all be concerned about the women who believe that their raging activism is the matriarchal future of the world? Do they not "get" that a male doctor was so moved by the tragedies of survivors that he has dedicated a unique career to helping them? What is between this determinedly endless raging and: doing the individual work? assimilating examples of males and females assisting others? contemplating that males, females, and others who are presently participating in excellent in leadership might stall out because of the endless raging by activists? At any time in their lives, did these women think? Or, have they raged their way into the present?
In other activism, some 100,000 WalMart cashiers will split a $65 million settlement. WalMart violated a state law by refusing to provide seating for on-duty cashiers, and now it must pay. These cashiers sued, following an established pattern and system, and won. I did not even know about their concerns until I looked at news updates today. Perhaps this will turn the tide for other people who would do more if permitted to utilize reasonable accommodations, such as seating. Has seating become reasonable?
Bach is not noise, Madam. (Robert, in Two's Company)
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/12/2018 01:36PM by Shop-et-al.