Not saying I'm doing it but.... not telling the whole truth? {rant}
Warning: For Full Access Please Log In or Create an Account (Free)
Yep! Totally get it. Weird things happen.
Yeah, I et what you are saying. It's like when you are in a line and the employee hits all the marks on the three people ahead of you, but when it's your turn, a customer walks up and starts loudly complaining or something, and they don't really have an opportunity to offer such and such or whatever. You can explain what happened in great detail, or you can just give them the credit. It's a dilemma.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/16/2025 05:04AM by mystery2me.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/16/2025 05:04AM by mystery2me.
I regret reporting all the issues while I am spending a lot of time writing out the report but once I get it in and it is accepted I am glad that I explained in detail how it happened so it can be corrected. I have thankfully not run into issues with reporting things that have gone strangely.
Yes, I get this.
My approach has changed over the years.
I offer up the minimum response to fulfill the requirement.
I used to think I was doing a good thing by offering up more info - that they should want to know.
Only came back to bite me.
So, I've become more robotic.
Of course, longer narratives are different, but they don't generally pay lol.
My approach has changed over the years.
I offer up the minimum response to fulfill the requirement.
I used to think I was doing a good thing by offering up more info - that they should want to know.
Only came back to bite me.
So, I've become more robotic.
Of course, longer narratives are different, but they don't generally pay lol.
I went through similar on a recent Burlington audit. The store was near perfect. 3 out of 5 categories had zero mis sized items and the other two only had 1 mis sized item. QC emailed and asked if I was doing these correctly in not a nice tone. They said that these numbers are not on par for most shops like this. The shop sat in “pending validation” for almost 3 weeks. It finally was approved and I was paid, but not without hassle. Goodness, forbid that the employees actually did their job!
I understand where you are coming from.
Example, I had a shop and took my spouse. I reported on the condition I found in my bathroom and I shared the condition of the bathroom my spouse visited.
I got questioned on the additional info I gained from my spouse. It was not wanted by the editor/MSC.
So I do only the minimum per the guidelines.
Example, I had a shop and took my spouse. I reported on the condition I found in my bathroom and I shared the condition of the bathroom my spouse visited.
I got questioned on the additional info I gained from my spouse. It was not wanted by the editor/MSC.
So I do only the minimum per the guidelines.
I absolutely agree with Olympia and all other posters.
Yes, the sme thing happened to me the other day. I was talking to the sales person when all of a sudden he left to talk to another customer....and didn't return for over half an hour. I just told the msc that happened. Haven't recieved any complaint....yet.
I think I'm a naturally detail-oriented person. When I was younger, I would go into great detail and note everything. However, as time has gone by, I only go to the trouble of noting material/significant events/items on an evaluation. In general, for deliverables, I try to think of it from the perspective of the recipient now, and tailor it accordingly.
I had a shop that was largely focused around a sales evaluation. From the start to the fitting room was one salesperson, and then a new salesperson took over after the fitting room. As it was a comprehensive evaluation meant for one salesperson from start to finish, I explained what happened and provided descriptions for both sales associates. I'll often write more and then let the editor discern what's needed/relevant.
I had a shop that was largely focused around a sales evaluation. From the start to the fitting room was one salesperson, and then a new salesperson took over after the fitting room. As it was a comprehensive evaluation meant for one salesperson from start to finish, I explained what happened and provided descriptions for both sales associates. I'll often write more and then let the editor discern what's needed/relevant.
Yes I leave out details that are not part of the survey.
Case in point. I have done hotel shops with bar portions for them up in NYC. On two occasions as I'm at the bar an escort sat down next to me.
When I had posted about that somewhere else, someone asked if I put that in the report. I said no. There was no questions in the report about such an occurrence.
Case in point. I have done hotel shops with bar portions for them up in NYC. On two occasions as I'm at the bar an escort sat down next to me.
When I had posted about that somewhere else, someone asked if I put that in the report. I said no. There was no questions in the report about such an occurrence.
There are so many things I would like to say to some of these companies, but my comments are not within the scope of the surveys and are somewhat subjective. For example, every Freddy's I go to has excellent service and great food but the floors are always greasy, the interior ductwork is covered with dust, and the parking lots need a powerwash and a new striping and curb painting. There is a regionalized Italian restaurant chain where I shop 3 stores. All of them just look "tired". When I was a new restaurant manager many years ago, someone told me, "Yes, you clean all the time but you clean the same things. You need to look outside the box." I learned that if you sit on the floor in your restaurant you will find gum stuck underneath every table. gross. If you stand back and take a hard look, you can see things you will ordinarily miss. I wish there was a general comments box for many of my shops where I could say anything I wanted. Oh, and I was in a restaurant where the female cashier had a heavy beard and bad teeth. It was disturbing to see but I don't want to tell the truth and be blocked from shopping this company as I love their food.
I often have gotten bit in the rear reporting accurately. When something is not perfect and reported as such it raises questions. Kinda stinks as for honesty you get hassled.
I used to be naive. I used to think the purpose of shops was to help the business improve its operations (and sometimes it is)
But along the way, I've gathered that sometimes - and this is just my observation - they seem to be a way to get an independent source to validate how wonderful your operations are in a 1,000 ways....so that you can stand up in a marketing meeting or with a group of investors and brag about the latest stats from your MSing program that prove your wonderfulness.
But along the way, I've gathered that sometimes - and this is just my observation - they seem to be a way to get an independent source to validate how wonderful your operations are in a 1,000 ways....so that you can stand up in a marketing meeting or with a group of investors and brag about the latest stats from your MSing program that prove your wonderfulness.
In 2018, + or - a yr. or 2, I was closing a purchase in my store. The female mentioned I looked familiar and as I have always been in sales, that occasionally occurred. She then proceeded to inquire as to my first name being Bob. As we chatted, she mentioned my last name, the color and make/model of my car. Thankfully, as I was beginning to become concerned, she stated that a district manager of CheckSmart, her place of employment, had sent out a memo outing me as a shopper.
I later learned the primary reason for my visits was not location improvement but that the company was required, due to a lending law, to provide oversight. Once pay day loans were outlawed in Ohio, the shops were discontinued, but the stores remained open.
A few yrs. back, I was visiting my neighborhood Kroger's. As it was built in 1958, there were not any public restrooms. It was necessary, when the need arose, to enter the warehouse and walk through the break room. I noticed management had placed a description of known shoppers on a bulletin board; I was not included.
There have been several occasions where the requirements of the work were such that I was figuratively wearing a sign around my neck.
I later learned the primary reason for my visits was not location improvement but that the company was required, due to a lending law, to provide oversight. Once pay day loans were outlawed in Ohio, the shops were discontinued, but the stores remained open.
A few yrs. back, I was visiting my neighborhood Kroger's. As it was built in 1958, there were not any public restrooms. It was necessary, when the need arose, to enter the warehouse and walk through the break room. I noticed management had placed a description of known shoppers on a bulletin board; I was not included.
There have been several occasions where the requirements of the work were such that I was figuratively wearing a sign around my neck.
Yep, like many others, I've learned that any oddity that occurs, through no fault or action of your own, throws the editors into a tizzy and your shop can get dragged out for weeks for "clarification".
I worked in retail management for 25 years. I always used mystery shop reports to train and develop my team. Employees can fall into bad habits that can go unnoticed. I found the feedback valuable. It’s why I started MS when I couldn’t dedicate time to full time work because I was raising my family. Sure could companies use it as a marketing tool? Sure but if the profits aren’t there it’s a moot point. Investors are not impressed with feedback they invest on profits. Not a great system but it’s what we are working with.
Unfortunately, many times editors delete important information and make the comments very generic, so business owners/managers are prevented from receiving information that they would certainly want to have, such as toilets not being properly cleaned for literally months and months. There is a big difference between a toilet being dirty from recent use, as opposed to dried waste that has been there for months, but the editors don't seem to want anything unpleasant in the reports.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/23/2025 08:51PM by mjt9598.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/23/2025 08:51PM by mjt9598.
Several yrs. ago, Ardent inadvertently returned my report. It had been so altered, I was very unusually pissed. I respected their right to change what they desired, but the following day, I terminated our agreement.
@shopperbob wrote:
Several yrs. ago, Ardent inadvertently returned my report. It had been so altered, I was very unusually pissed. I respected their right to change what they desired, but the following day, I terminated our agreement.
I've had that happen with another MS company. They accidentally sent a report back to me for clarification of something I knew I had already reported. The editors had altered my report so much that it was a recitation of things that didn't happen. I was shocked! I complained. The supervisor entered the conversation and basically said, "Oops!"
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.