SA ~ That’s a lot of stats! They may have tens of thousands - but millions? I question their reporting. We would have zero work if they were all active.
I agree that the board is a microcosm, but the pro shoppers who do at least 5 shops/month+ are their bread and butter. Even a petition from the shoppers on this board and others notifying them of 3 month ban would make them take notice. They have no clue how their MS operation is being handled and how much money the numbskulls in charge of it lose for them by giving them too much power and control - which is happening despite their use of algorithms.
When it comes to their verifiable shoppers, we all know it takes practice to get things right. Not many people have the will, skills or patience to achieve that, so it’s likely they have far fewer than what they purport to have. The ones who possess these traits often find better work, in they’re so inclined. Companies like Dip SOS know this, so instead of paying their shopper a fair wage for their efforts, they find a way to cheat them to save $ and devaluing them. Losing a ton of MSs along the way means nothing - at least to their middle management. In their case it’s a bit of a Ponzi scheme, which most people refuse to accept. They take on the role of the ‘pusher’ by offering big bonuses that lure people in and keep them interested, then quickly find a way to take advantage or lay blame. We all know who the biggest #1 culprit is as far as that goes. Many of the smaller companies are much better at starting with somewhat decent pay and treating their shoppers fairly. They play by the rules and deserve to be supported for it. They definitely need to be ready to invest so that DS doesn’t gain the upper hand. AI is moving very fast.
What I’ve observed is in populations of say 50-100K per 100 square miles, the MSCs struggle to find ICs. Even if they get a couple, the gas/mileage becomes the issue. You would think they would be using GoPro technology for gas station shops by now. As for videotaping, I’m not sure if AI can process that. If not, do they really want to take the time to watch recordings or read a 3 sentence report? I doubt they’ve figured that out yet.
If AI can fill some gaps - which I sincerely hope it can - the upside is there will be no more cheating, gaslighting, power tripping and general BS you get from humans, or the various sub-species they hire. I find much less stressful dealing with the 80-90% of the companies who play by the rules who appreciate what we do for them.