@sandyf wrote:
luckygirl your name says a lot to me. Perhaps unintentional on your part but everything I have I have worked hard for and I have been frugal all my life saving a good percentage of my income for my retirement. Now I am retired except for mystery shopping and yet many who do not know my well think I am "lucky" for being comfortable now. And frugality has always been fun to me. I never felt I needed all the things those now with no money in retirement did like excessive vacations, buying a closet full of the latest fashions, eating lunch out everyday at work at an $$ restaurant.
Kind of sidelines this conversation but back to the topic, those people who have blogs or even magazine articles about their shopping may well be earning more for that one article or blog than they ever earned shopping. The "professional" social media wannabees will do anything for a following. They see $$$ in their future and some actually do make it. Same with those who try mystery shopping who think if you shop Gucci you get a free Gucci something for your review of the item.
@luckygirl0100 wrote:
My user name has been the same for EVERYTHING since I was about 16... it refers to the Lucky brand of jeans. I've only worn this brand of jeans since I started working and purchasing my own clothes. It has absolutely ZERO to do with luck.
@veebeeshops wrote:
Haven't seen it, but, makes me wonder if this may have been a PR piece placed by MSCs to get more folks interested. What mystery shopper would intentionally drum up national attention to this industry, especially by promoting specific companies? Why would anyone bother to do that?
@sueac101 wrote:
The article is in the Woman's World Dec.26,2022 issue on page 42.
It mentions several companies and the person claims that she has done hotels, airlines,restaurants "all over the world" for them. claims they make $500 a month for 5 -10 hours a week and "Thousands in reimbursements". from the job.
I took the article with a grain of salt.
@SueW70 wrote:
The person in the article is either delusional, a liar or both. If you do fine dining shops you will be working more than 5 to 10 hours as the reports are very tedious and detailed. I did many and the degree of detail including photos of food and descriptions of the ingredients, presentation and taste were extremely lengthy. I have a friend who I told about mystery shopping and she did a fine dining shop. I had shown her a copy of one of the reports I had done previously as a guide. From what I can tell she wrote a very detailed report. She made the mistake after working many hours on the report of describing the waiter as a balding obese gentleman, which from the photo she discretely snapped he was. The report was denied as she used derogatory terms to describe the gentleman. I bet they used the report and just decided not to pay her. That was her first and only mystery shop! Whoever wrote this tall tale in the magazine should write for TV as most of the shops stink!
@mjt9598 wrote:
I can't believe they would reject the report, rather than just having her correct the description to be more appropriate.
@SueW70 wrote:
The person in the article is either delusional, a liar or both. If you do fine dining shops you will be working more than 5 to 10 hours as the reports are very tedious and detailed. I did many and the degree of detail including photos of food and descriptions of the ingredients, presentation and taste were extremely lengthy. I have a friend who I told about mystery shopping and she did a fine dining shop. I had shown her a copy of one of the reports I had done previously as a guide. From what I can tell she wrote a very detailed report. She made the mistake after working many hours on the report of describing the waiter as a balding obese gentleman, which from the photo she discretely snapped he was. The report was denied as she used derogatory terms to describe the gentleman. I bet they used the report and just decided not to pay her. That was her first and only mystery shop! Whoever wrote this tall tale in the magazine should write for TV as most of the shops stink!
@SueW70 wrote:
The person in the article is either delusional, a liar or both. If you do fine dining shops you will be working more than 5 to 10 hours as the reports are very tedious and detailed.
@MsJudi wrote:
I much prefer to read the escapades of SteveinCA who used to post here but no longer does. He could show you how to make MS a game for worldwide travel at little cost and was actually someone people (not me) knew personally. Hey Steve, where've ya been?