In my experience GAPbusters is a company that does not even attempt to meet the same high standards it expects its XEC's (contractors) to apply in judgment of other companies.
This is particularly disreputable given that it markets its product to help promote just such practices and actions in other companies
My experience when holding them to the same standards as they have their XEC's apply in judgment on other companies is -- in the first instance they ignore complaints entirely - then if forced to make a response respond off topic - if that does not discourage complaint threaten removal from their data base (not much of a threat give their low level of remuneration) - remove from data base. A fine outstanding example of how to manage good customer relations
It is not much of a surprise that a company might act in this way, but what is VERY OFFENSIVE is that this company makes its money advising other companies about how to better serve its customers and how to remain on message. All things it can’t or won’t do itself.
It is true that I am a disgruntled ex-contractor. I severed relations myself as I came to the conclusion that something was fundamentally wrong with the company and the double standards it employs. They provide advice & comment to companies how to better train their staff to achieve better customer relations - whilst NOT following those actions or practices itself. As now might have guessed, I personally abhor this type of double standard and will go to all levels possible to expose such and attempt to get appropriate penalty to apply)
I would promote anybody that has relations with this company and for that matter any other mystery shopping company is that they be held to the same standards of responsiveness, attentiveness and responsibility that should be applied to any company.
I can advise from parallel experience with a number of other Mystery Shopping Companies that GAPbusters practices are not the industry standard or anywhere near the norm. I would suggest their practices as the relate to XEC's are in the GGUTTER. Certainly other companies follow similar low renumeration practices, but they are responsive to issues raised, can maintain websites that actually work reliably and easy to interact with etc - ALL AREAS THAT GAPbusters FAIL ABYSMALLY AT.
XEC's need to stand up and take no further CR_P. This and other companies make good money from the honest efforts of their contractors and these contractors should be expected to have the same standards of conduct applied to them as theyy have applied to others (and make good money from).
The can not OPERATE WITHOUT THE EFFORTS OF CONTRACTORS and given that they need to be responsive and attentive to contractor concerns. To treat contractors in any other way is, I belive a deplorable DOUBLE STANDARD AND SHOULD NOT BE TOLERATED